Sometimes a Disability Insurance Benefits or Supplemental Security Income case that seems clear cut can take a few unexpected turns. A claimant had valid IQ scores and other severe impairments that placed them as meeting the requirements of Listing 12.05C. The Administrative Law Judge found that the claimant’s I.Q. scores were within the required range and that the claimant had other severe impairments; however, the Administrative Law Judge proceeded to Step Five of the sequential analysis and denied the claimant. On appeal, the argument was made that the claimant met Listing 12.05C. The Appeals Council agreed and awarded the case. The claimant is finally getting the benefits she deserves.
“These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.”
